Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fridge Cooking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fridge Cooking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any source for where the article creator said this originated (or any other sites that describe this process and how it's different from marination, for that matter). Lugia2453 (talk) 17:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. The claim that it was invented by 2 cooks in 2012 makes me think of
WP:ONEDAY. There are some uses of the term "fridge cooking" online to refer to cooking with the contents of your fridge (rather than going to the store), similar to "empty fridge cooking", "contents of the fridge cooking", etc, but that is not topic of this article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:ONEDAY. As the article creator notes on the Talk page, "You won't find any documentation of fridge cooking because it is such a new concept. I am here to document it, and try to validate it." That is not the purpose of an encyclopedia. (I tried to find a reason to keep this article, at least to see if it could be developed further, because I am troubled by the trend of deletion noms on the day articles are created. The comment by the creator convinced me to cast my !vote for deletion. This is the wrong place to document or validate something.) Geoff ^{Who, me?} 21:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.