Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulham Davies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fulham Davies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) guidlines.Does not cite sufficient and verifiable references.--Ntmg (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. The only sources cited in the article are a local newspaper obituary, another local newspaper article, and the Social Security Death Index. He sounds like an exemplary citizen, but nothing in the article suggests the kind of individual distinction that qualifies for
WP:BIO. I can't find anything else online. --Orlady (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Orlady (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Sounds like this fellow was an outstanding individual who was loved and respected by family and friends and led a full life, but we are not Ancestry.com Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - It could be because of age but Google News searches including the alias "Ki", the documentary film and companies (Merrill Lynch and Fenner and Beane) did not provide anything useful. However, a Google Books provided two results (Security dealers of North America and Investor's reader) but they seem to be directories. Although obituaries are often excellent sources for details about a person's life, this article reads too much like a personal biography. SwisterTwister talk 07:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.