Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fun management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV essay, original research, referenced almost entirely with unreliable sources. Creator removed PROD tag without explanation.

• Delete - the original author says it best. There are no sources or any real definition of this management style. Nothing to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 02:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per article text: "there is no exact definition or sources about it". Article topic does not have sufficient coverage to pass
  WP:N and may also lack sufficient context for other editors to meaningfully improve the article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as per Nom, GB fan & DustFormsWords. Codf1977 (talk) 10:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not encyclopedic. Jusdafax 17:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Essay.
  talk) 20:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, Essay, OR, speculation, errors, etc. Hairhorn (talk) 02:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.