Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funding Options

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Funding Options

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article--the references are either general references on Designated Funding portals, or mere mentions, press releases. or promotional interviews -- see

WP:NCORP. DGG ( talk ) 01:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am raising an objection to this proposed deletion. This proposal for deletion has been prompted as a result of a draft article submitted by me relating to Alternative Business Funding (ABF), the originator of the three current UK government designated portals. This content was subject to speedy deletion by DGG who, as a result of my appeal against that deletion, has now reviewed Funding Options for deletion as well. At this stage I simply wish to register the objection. I will add further comment once I have had time to prepare a reasoned argument for this objection.Casius12 (talk) 11:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet
WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

K.e.coffman It seems we are going round this circle again. Please see the discussion that is talking place with User:DGG regarding this page and Alternative Business Funding as a result of your original deletion decision. This has not yet been resolved and both decisions are linked. Casius12 (talk) 17:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are linked. Please see Bank referral scheme, DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 12:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article does not meet the criteria in
reliable secondary sources that are unrelated to the company. Sources cited in the article include a list of executives, a blog post by the company's CEO, and other articles that mention the company in a passing way — not as a subject of the article — or websites that are simply supportive of facts in the article (and not about the company itself). - tucoxn\^talk 19:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.