Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funk Masters of Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No references have been presented during this discussion which show notability. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Funk Masters of Wrestling

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Only sources are primary or from wrestling databases with no criteria for inclusion (and therefore do not establish notability). Nikki♥311 13:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 13:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets
WP:NSPORT states is our guideline for this. I believe the number of tag team championships won by the group would qualify under #3. - Galatz ^Talk 14:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

I'd agree if they'd held notable championships in more than one major promotion to satisfy "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". I think arguing that holding a few championships in an independent promotion satisfies "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" is stretching. Nikki♥311 01:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't really see an issue. More sourcing is needed, but it's hardly a classic reason for deletion. <ref>http://fmwwrestling.us/FMWHistory2.html</ref>, <ref>https://prowrestlingradio.com/terry-funk-pro-wrestling-radio-interview/</ref>, <ref>http://www.puroresucentral.com/FMWReview-FunkMasters.html</ref> Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FMWwrestling is primary. Puroresucentral is not a proven reliable source. You still haven't proven how it meets

WP:MUSTBESOURCES. Nikki♥311 16:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 15:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 15:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 15:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet
synthesis. All of this leads me to consider that there is serious instances of citation overkill to falsely present notability. -- Otr500 (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.