Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funky Dee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Funky Dee

Funky Dee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of those musician articles that stretches fortunate connections and

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. (Article Author). Regardless of the quality of sources, he had a viral hit single in 2009 with over four million plays across YouTube, Spotify and Apple Music and many more offline. Happy to work together to improve the article if needs be. What would deleting this accomplish? --ItsLuke (contribs) 10:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Regretful Delete - I wanted to keep this one, but I'm just not seeing anything that's really
  WP:GNG. FOARP (talk) 16:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Weak Delete per FOARP. I too was unable to find enough RS to meet the criteria at
  WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.