Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Schoenfeld
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfyed to User:GSchoenfeld and then deleted. Avi 18:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gabriel Schoenfeld
This is a kind of procedural nomination for
]- Keep. Although a bio, it can be reasonably cited. Give it some time. ~ Flameviper 14:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Flameviper. He's the author of a non-fiction book that had independent reviews, like these, and he also appears to have given expert evidence to the US Senate[1]. --Mereda 14:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleteunless notably expanded, sourced and properly cited by end of this AfD Alf photoman 17:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Delete I failed to read the rules on writing an autobiographical entry before writing this. Although I tried to write the entry in a neutral fashion, now that I have read the rules, I see the difficulties. I will be content with whatever consensus and decision emerges. --Schoenfeld 14 January 2007
- Delete unless expanded, sourced etc. as argued above by Alf photoman. This article has future potential, which it might realize if it gets third-party printed articles commenting on Schoenfeld's work. Without outside sources, a very one-sided article with a promotional feel may result. No prejudice against re-creation if the author can come back later with a better version. Having the subject write his own article is dubious anyway given WP:COI. If he wants to recreate, he could always send a Talk message to the administrator who closed the AfD. EdJohnston 21:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.