Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriela García

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Gabriela García

Gabriela García (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  Avilich (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Venezuela. Shellwood (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6] among many many more Spanish sources. Clearly significant figure in Venezuelan football with ongoing international and fully pro career abroad. Articule enes improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] and [4] are about a different person(!) the rest of these are mostly interviews or quote-heavy (not independent) or individual match reports and so do not count toward GNG.

Avilich (talk) 23:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

While I agree that Das osmnezz was careless with providing some of those links, I thoroughly disagree with your assessment of the Diario AS article. It is not a match report in the conventional sense (in fact the newspaper did its routine match report here), but rather a recap of Gaby's career which notes that she reached a milestone (100 competitive matches with Deportivo) that no other woman had yet accomplished. It certainly counts toward SIGCOV, and if there's something more, I'll be !voting keep. Jogurney (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep Per sources above and what's on es:Gabriela García, I feel there is just enough to pass basic GNG. Regards. Govvy (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Besides the sources I found above, I also found [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], and [13], among many many more Spanish sources. Clearly significant figure in Venezuelan and Spanish league football with ongoing international and fully pro career abroad. Articule enes improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the same applies to these, more Q&A interviews and other quote-heavy articles.

Avilich (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep per the sources posted by Das osmnezz (excluding the two about a different subject). There is enough content that isn’t quotes/interview answers in there for a close pass of GNG. Carson Wentz (talk) 02:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There are a pair of good Diario AS sources, plus a number of lower quality sources from Marca and El Estímulo, and I believe it's enough to meet
  WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - just about passes GNG with El Estímulo, Diario AS and a small amount of coverage in La Vanguardia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 21:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources above passes
  WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep sources provided by other users show article meets
  WP:GNG. --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.