Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamer Time Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sources were not presented.-Wafulz (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gamer Time Radio

Procedural nom as de-Prod. Does not meet

WP:RS reliable sources and has been tagged requiring references since November 2007. Breno ^talk 01:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment Not voting at this time but here's what I've got. First, the nomination for an award looks both serious and non-trivial. I'd say it establishes some degree of notability. There are tons of gaming podcasts out there, and a real review process appears to have happened. However, past that I can't find anything. Apparently there are some proposed notability criteria for podcasts here but I've no idea how we treat wikiproject notability guidelines. That's all I've got. At the moment I don't know enough to form an opinion (either notability or policy) so I'll pass for now. Hobit (talk) 02:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Under
WP:WEB guidelines a podcast is notable if it has won a well-known and independent award, so a nomination would not count. I get where you're coming from saying that they have to be reasonably well-known to receive a nomination, but bear in mind the Podcast Awards have 10 nominees in 22 categories – 220 nominations in the 2007 awards! I'm part of WP Podcasting, and although a proposal went through discussion on the talk page, it never eventuated as a notability guideline. As a result we continue to use WEB when assessing podcast notability. Thanks. --Breno ^talk 03:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the
list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 06:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - I think I've heard this podcast mentioned in at least a couple of articles on the (reliable) gaming news sites I frequent. It's new, nominated, and probably notable, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. User:Krator (t c) 17:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment article is completely unsourced and is currently not passing
WP:V policy, so if you have those sources it would be appreciated. Thanks. --Breno ^talk 00:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Little coverage in non-self-published sources, aside from award nom and [1] -- pb30<talk> 05:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.