Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gas-free engineer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gas-free engineer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking citations since 2009, this looks like a US Navy designation that may not be sufficiently notable to warrant a separate article. Not sure if there is a good merge/redirect target. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A possible redirect target would be Confined_space#Entry_certification, where the term is mentioned. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I am inclined to agree that this is not a sufficiently notable term to warrant an article. I don't think a redirect would serve much use in this instance. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I has hits in google, mostly for job postings and the like. not notable for our purposes. Oaktree b (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.