Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Hallman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Hallman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet

unsourced

.

I'm a bit suspicious of this article as well, because it was written promotionally for years by multiple

SPAs (but I know that's not a reason for deletion - it just means it would have to majorly be cleaned up). Whisperjanes (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very much a non-notable businessman. Reads way too much like a resume or a CV. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.