Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Swier

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Swier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

associate assistant advisor to the something something something research unit key figure somehow unspecified blah blah nn Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the ]
Could you list the sources, I couldn't find much myself. Although, admittedly I don't know much about Geoff Swier.Jonpatterns (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete possibly he was around in the 1990s during the privatizations, as an adviser and somebody who was asked by the press to make short statements, but he fails
    WP:MUSTBESOURCES, then please show them, give us some links, NealeFamily. Kraxler (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.