Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Van Saun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Van Saun

George Van Saun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of this can be verified; probably a hoax. AxelBoldt (talk) 06:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as possible hoax. His Personal Journals refer only to Wikipedia. Quick Google Search for "George Van Saun" doctor is not helpful. I suspect he was a real person. --
  Vejvančický (talk) 07:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete - even if the person was real, he wouldn't meet the notability requisites. McMarcoP (talk) 07:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - book cited as source doesn't seem to exist, probable hoax, anyway fails
  WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Non-notable person or hoax.
  talk) 15:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete even if it is not
  WP:HOAX, the subject is clearly NN - A person found dead over 50 years ago and death merely reported in local paper seems a clear case of being NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete fails
  WP:N. Jll (talk) 09:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.