Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Voorhis

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ronald McDonald. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

George Voorhis

George Voorhis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The one source is not clealry relaible, but even if it was one source is not enough to show notability. It also is much more about others than Voorhis. Voorhis was a clown involved in the activities of a fast food company in part of the US, it seems there were other clowns working with the same fast food company in other parts of the US at the time. Considering the size and cultural impact of the company in question, if Voorhis was really a defining force behind their top recognized clown and his rise to fame and cultural impact, we should be able to find more sources on him. However, I looked though all the links to sources on the article {news, newspapers, scholar etc] and it turned up several mentions of other George Voorhis in totally different times and contexts, but not one additional source that actually discusses this George Voorhis. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.