Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia men's national ice hockey team
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 22:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Georgia men's national ice hockey team
- Georgia men's national ice hockey team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources. No evidence of participation in sanctioned international competitions. No evidence that this team exists as a National Team. Hairyns (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This seems to suggest that it exists. It seems to me that being a national team for a sport does make something inherently notable and the precedent on Wikipedia is to include national sports teams. Their results are here. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article is fully sourced. National team clearly exists even if only during the time the games were played. Also I dont think a national team would need to have participate in an international competition to pass notability. Salavat (talk) 13:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I don't see why a national team would not be notable. And the IIHF sources seem to confirm that this is a national team. Rlendog (talk) 15:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - here the IIHF's page on them [1]. Member since 2009. TerminalPreppie (talk) 13:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Clearly existent. Cheers! Feedintm (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.