Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Creepy Crawlies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Giant Creepy Crawlies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a documentary television film, not

WP:TVSHOW. As always, films don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and must show some properly sourced evidence of significance (notable film or television awards, critical analysis, etc.) -- but the only claim of notability on offer here is that it existed, the only "source" is its IMDb entry, and the article has been flagged for lacking sourcing since 2008 without ever having any new sourcing added to bolster notability. Bearcat (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, and United Kingdom. Bearcat (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources found. Only hits on spiders in general. Oaktree b (talk) 01:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.