Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibran Noorani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gibran Noorani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only passing mentions, no significant coverage. Kleuske (talk) 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this article has been created for informational purpose please contest this deletion and keep it on wikipedia its a real person and kind of famous in Indian Film industry

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshayzine13 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Akshayzine13 (talk Removing Deletion warning from the Gibran Noorani and Considering its Wikipedia's decision anything comes out please mention on my Akshayzine13 (talk talk page of [:Gibran Noorani]] talk page —Preceding undated comment added 09:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability is
self-promotion.--Rpclod (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite the above assertion about the subject being "kind of famous", the tailored Wikiproject India search identifies no coverage about him. The sources in the article and available from a standard Google search are mainly the usual social media plus some listings as a dentist. No
WP:BASIC criteria. AllyD (talk) 21:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Unable to find any reliable source about this person. Fails
Anup [Talk] 03:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete -
totally ordinary. Bearian (talk) 02:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.