Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilaman
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Gilaman
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gilaman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Khestwol (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete The person lacks the references to be notable. Whatever his role in the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement is, the article shouldn't be kept without reliable in-depth sources on him. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Besides being a poet (artist) and political activist, Gilaman was also reported to be a victim of Khestwol (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)]
- Not to be rude or anything, but you can say whatever you want about the person. It's completely meaningless to the AfD process if you don't back it up with sources though. The only reference in the article about anyone getting arrested or anything similar to it doesn't even mention him. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps we need to find more sources about his Pashto poetry to add it to article? It will be in Pashto though. Khestwol (talk) 19:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)]
- Maybe as long as they proper sources. You might want to look over WP:GNG first though if your not familiar with it. If all the sources are in Pashto, it might better to just create a Pashto article instead. Since it indicates people who speak that language are probably going to be more interested in the person then English speakers. Whoever they are. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)]
- OK, I will try to add something. Also, the English-language article from Khestwol (talk) 19:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)]
- Oh, my bad. I was thinking that might have been the case. It doesn't help with finding sources if he goes by a bunch of alternative names. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- He's not going by a buch of alternative names. He only goes by two names, as many Western creative professionals do, but they are not in the Roman alphabet, and there is not such a standardised way of transcribing those names into the Roman alphabet as there is with Russian or Chinese names, for example. Yes, that makes it more difficult to find sources in the Roman alphabet, but it is by no means going by a bunch of alternative names in order to confuse those of us who are most comfortable using English. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)]
- He's not going by a buch of alternative names. He only goes by two names, as many Western creative professionals do, but they are not in the Roman alphabet, and there is not such a standardised way of transcribing those names into the Roman alphabet as there is with Russian or Chinese names, for example. Yes, that makes it more difficult to find sources in the Roman alphabet, but it is by no means going by a bunch of alternative names in order to confuse those of us who are most comfortable using English.
- Oh, my bad. I was thinking that might have been the case. It doesn't help with finding sources if he goes by a bunch of alternative names. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I will try to add something. Also, the English-language article from
- Maybe as long as they proper sources. You might want to look over
- Perhaps we need to find more sources about his Pashto poetry to add it to article? It will be in Pashto though.
- Not to be rude or anything, but you can say whatever you want about the person. It's completely meaningless to the AfD process if you don't back it up with sources though. The only reference in the article about anyone getting arrested or anything similar to it doesn't even mention him. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Besides being a poet (artist) and political activist, Gilaman was also reported to be a victim of
- Delete per @Adamant1:
- Update: I have now created a Pashto article on Gilaman as mentioned above. Also, I added another source to this en article [1]. The new source clearly states that
Hazrat Naeem Abdul Qayum, alias Gilaman Pashteen, [has] allegedly been abducted and forcibly disappeared.
As of now, Gilaman is one of the few people on Wikipedia (6) who are included in Category:2020s missing person cases. Of course, I think Gilaman is also notable for his Pashto poetry. But if this article is deleted, we might need to create another article to at least mention Gilaman's enforced disappearance event from Multan Airport as perKhestwol (talk) 20:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 06:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 06:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 18:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 18:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the subject fails to quality general notability guideline. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- As a side note, as I have written before, the nom Khestwol (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete per nomination since subject fails ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.