Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girish Khatiwada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Girish Khatiwada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable vlogger Legacypac (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep one of the first hip hop artists in Nepal in the duo GP (which is suggested as a search term) according to this reliable source here Atlantic306 (talk) 01:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: with the greatest respect to Atlantic306, I think their !vote fundamentally mistakes what notability is. Being the first to do something in itself confers no notability. For example, "Bob was one of the first opera singers in Iceland" is a similar statement (assume it is backed up with one reliable source) doesn't make Bob notable in the slightest. Often, being the first person to do something will elicit media coverage which does confer notability. However, there simply aren't enough
as a standalone article, it's a delete from me. DrStrauss talk 16:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment I meant he has received sig coverage partly because he was jointly with his co - rapper the first hip hop artist in Nepal and therefore passes
WP:NMUSIC. Having an article on the duo would be a good alternative to this article if it goes. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The coverage does not rise to the level required to pass the notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.