Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girls (Yung Baby Tate album)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There is consensus to keep this article in some form (either as an article about the album, or about the rapper, or both).
]Girls (Yung Baby Tate album)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Girls (Yung Baby Tate album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This album got one review from Pitchfork (already cited) but I can find nothing else in WP:A9 because there is no article on the rapper, but maybe the album's importance is boosted by the reviews it has received. There is very little to find about the rapper besides tidbits in the reviews and this: [1]. There might be enough for a stub article about her, but that should come before an article for this album. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: I have altered my nomination to reflect the existence of various reviews as noted by Aoba47 below. I missed most of those in my WP:BEFORE search, perhaps due to the album's generic title. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: I have altered my nomination to reflect the existence of various reviews as noted by Aoba47 below. I missed most of those in my
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: This Aoba47 (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)]
- Thank you for the update. The album's title is very generic so it is understandable how a before search may have missed these sources. That is one of the most frustrating parts about working on an article about a generically named subject matter lol. Aoba47 (talk) 19:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)]
- Thank you for the update. The album's title is very generic so it is understandable how a before search may have missed these sources. That is one of the most frustrating parts about working on an article about a generically named subject matter lol.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - The sources found by Aoba47 seem sufficient to me. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - given the sources that I have located and listed above, I feel that WP:GNG has been fulfilled here. Aoba47 (talk) 21:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)]
- I have no dispute with this, but we may need a Yung Baby Tate article to go with the album, because someone may still call for deletion under WP:A9, rightly or wrongly. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)]
- I agree with that. Aoba47 (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)]
- I agree with that.
- I have no dispute with this, but we may need a Yung Baby Tate article to go with the album, because someone may still call for deletion under
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.