Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Weyl (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Weyl

Glen Weyl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence nor claim of notability.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

(T) 13:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete when the previous keep votes argued the person was notable because of how fast he got his Ph.D. to me that is a screaming sign that he is not notable. People are not notable because they get educated fast, and often people who plow through subjects fast do not have a deep understanding of them. OK, maybe I am biased because it was 9 years between when I started my bachelors degree and completed it, but still nothing shows this person is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I don't have the time to invest in adding this stuff to the article, but Glen Weyl is a fairly prominent and respected figure. He's widely cited as an inventor of quadratic voting (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/voting-methods/#QuadVotiLiquDemo), he co-authored a popular and influential book (https://www.amazon.com/Radical-Markets-Uprooting-Capitalism-Democracy/dp/0691177503), and he's one of the founders of a new and growing political organization/movement (https://radicalxchange.org/). Just googling his name turns up a large number of news articles and videos. He's also at least as notable as his co-author on Radical Markets, Eric Posner. User:Zhoulikan
• Keep hot young intellectual needs a better article. Note incoming link from Quadratic voting, a concept Weyl co-created. Recent book was widely reviewed - I added a few of the reviews.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)strike vote of sockpuppet.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The cites you added seem to be material for the book's notability - do they cover Weyl himself in any biographical detail? - David Gerard (talk) 19:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

not in depth, but multiple

WP:RS do cover his ideas in depth. Page just needs an editor, or just keep it and wait for it to be crowd-sourced.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC) strike apparent sockpuppet - David Gerard (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Easily meets
  WP:GNG. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep The book he co-authored is notable (that's a start),
  WP:PROF. Pichpich (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.