Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Cannabinoids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global Cannabinoids

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined G11 (I think it would've been eligible). Fails NCORP - little to no independent coverage. Mainly sourced to press-releases and other promotional pieces.

KH-1 (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
KH-1 (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~Delete I believe this passes
WP:GNG, references are good. This business is significant and I see no need to delete the article. GoldMiner24 (talk) 07:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
What do you believe are the
talk) 11:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Looking at this closer, I believe I was wrong. The sources I thought were best were the Business Insider articles as I thought them a reputable source, but actually reading the articles, I doubt that now. I also agree that it fails
WP:NPOV. Changing to delete. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 13:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I can't find evidence of notability, and the article is so promotional
talk) 17:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete A search for reliable coverage about the company comes up empty, otherwise I would suggest keeping and updating. Somb8franko (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.