Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Hotel Alliance (3rd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per sources provided during the discussion. I suggest further integration into the article, but that's not a matter for AfD. Star Mississippi 02:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global Hotel Alliance

Global Hotel Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:RS comes up empty (just some chatter in hospitality industry trade press, nothing of broader social interest) because it's a private holding company. FalconK (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Maybe in that case we should replace the article completely with material from the case studies. I'm surprised I didn't uncover those. FalconK (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The keep argument may be mistakenly worded, but it seems to indicate that an analysis of the sources was not performed. Therefore a more thorough look should be made.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.