Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glocal Khabar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glocal Khabar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable internet business purporting to be a legitimate news media/portal(?). No independent coverage, Fails

WP:NORG. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 08:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are four independent references. Our coverage of Nepalese organisations is very weak, and this is no worse than the information on most websites. I think we should keep it. Rathfelder (talk) 09:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rathfelder, I believe you are mistaken. Care to list them? If there were 2/3 (<4) SIGCOVs to be found, I wouldn't have AfDed it. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 09:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Of the 6 references used in this article, 3 are either from the Glocal Khabar's website or the company that owns it, another is its Alexa rank. The other two both appear to be local coverage of the same event held by Glocal Khabar in 2015, although one is currently a dead link. I'm not seeing enough to establish notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.