Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria Romero Roses (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Romero Roses

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete.

WP:BLP, with some advertorial/résumé overtones, of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate in a party primary. As always, this is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia in and of itself -- if you cannot demonstrate and properly source that she already passed a notability criterion for some other reason independent of running in the primary, then the primary itself does not get her over the inclusion bar. Bearcat (talk) 01:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is not even the head of the non-notable PAC she works with.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment She was also trounced in the primary. The fact that this article was kept in 2012 shows that Wikipedia needs to have more consistent enforcement of high notability standards for candidates.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

flyer 12:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.