Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Wing Chun terms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of Wing Chun terms

Glossary of Wing Chun terms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entire article is

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and trout nominator for vexacious litigation renomination without new arguments. This was discussed five months ago with a consensus to keep and move to current title. Deryck C. 11:10, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Editing my own comment as some people may misunderstand my use of the phrase "
    legal threat. Deryck C. 15:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wing Chun terms for the background - so what does trouting mean?PRehse (talk) 16:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind got it.PRehse (talk) 16:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Glossaries are valid content on Wikipedia per
  editing policy is to improve such content rather than deleting it. Andrew D. (talk) 14:48, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 17:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep wing chun is a well known martial art, would be easy to find RS for this. A list of terms like this is standard for Wikipedia. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Really? Nothing is
  verifiable? Even if we disregard the notability of Wing Chun, there are plenty of academic sources that would corroborate the terms listed in this glossary. To illustrate the point, here are the first two terms in this glossary in two separate academic sources: Siu Nim Tau (SUNY Press), Chum Kiu (Tuttle Publishing). Alex Shih^Talk 15:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Keep The external links and sources mentioned by others are sufficient to show enough coverage and that this is not original research. Papaursa (talk) 16:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.