Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go to Hell (song)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Hidden Treasures (EP). Consensus is to merge (non-admin closure) ES&L 11:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Go to Hell (song)
- Go to Hell (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The song looks more like a fan-cruft than a useful article. I believe it isn't a notable song and it doesn't have the potential to be anything more than a stub. In it's current state, the article hasn't got any references nor it has some retrieved information. I think that's more than enough to ask for deletion.--
talk) 13:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Keepconfirmed as appearing in both an EP by ]
- Comment: Appearing on a release by Megadeth doesn't make a song notable. There are no sources on the Internet that can help in expanding the article. In it's present condition it's nothing more than an original research filled with useless information.--talk) 11:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "It's crap!" is not a reason to delete an article. Did you check offline sources that can help expand the article, such as back issues of Billboard, Rolling Stone, Q or Kerrang! that might have reviewed the Bill & Ted soundtrack? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aside from being a "crap", the article doesn't have the potential to be anything more than that. If "99 Ways" is notable song (received Grammy nomination) this surely isn't. Making appearance on a Megadeth album (the band has more than 200 songs) and on a talk) 12:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And per WP:NSONG, it means it should be redirected, not deleted vis "Songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article should redirect to another relevant article". Which article would you suggest redirecting to? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think talk) 14:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries, I already made a redirect.--talk) 15:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I'm happy with Merge and redirect to Hidden Treasures (EP) as it measures the Bill & Ted appearance. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries, I already made a redirect.--
- I think
- And per
- Aside from being a "crap", the article doesn't have the potential to be anything more than that. If "99 Ways" is notable song (received Grammy nomination) this surely isn't. Making appearance on a Megadeth album (the band has more than 200 songs) and on a
- Comment: Appearing on a release by Megadeth doesn't make a song notable. There are no sources on the Internet that can help in expanding the article. In it's present condition it's nothing more than an original research filled with useless information.--
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.