Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godilanka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Could have been procedurally kept anyway, since it was a redirect page when it was nominated. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Godilanka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is title for village article, whch is not notable as per English wikipedia policies. It was earlier redirected to its district page, which is not meaningful. Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page is blank, is there a need for an AfD or Speedy delete instead? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If it's a populated place,
~~WP:NOTBURO. Jfire (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)~~[reply
]

Keep, now that it has been converted to a stub. Jfire (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This takes you to Wikipedia:Notability (local interests) that was a failed proposal with no judgement. Maybe time its revived again for more discussion so that a judgement can be reached and a policy can be hardlined for such pages. I was leaning to vote Draftify because sources were found that had indepth detail on the village, Godilanka Population - East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh and more by censusindia.co.in but this site has been blacklisted. If the creator can bring on reliable independent sources with notable detail, I will reconsider.RangersRus (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it should have redirected to the list of villages (sourced) at Allavaram mandal. It now does - or would, without the inappropriate AfD clutter. Enough sources exist, by the way, to restore it as a separate stub but since it's unlikely ever to be more than that, the redirect is probably better. Ingratis (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to Keep as stub, expanded by Arjunaraoc. Ingratis (talk) 09:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this AfD is procedurally inappropriate - perhaps someone uninvolved would close it? Ingratis (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Considering the above feedback, I have created a stub article, translating from the corresponding Telugu wiki article. I am withdrawing my nomination for deletion. Arjunaraoc (talk) 09:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.