Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoodHire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GoodHire

GoodHire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

looks like an advert. Fails WP:CORP LibStar (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't appear to be notable enough (see this search). —
  talk) 16:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Promotional article that does not satisfactorily establish notability. Press releases are not reliable sources for much of anything beyond dates and names, and they certainly don't establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a near
  wp:SPA is the only contributor (far better than most of the ones we see here, admittedly). And with CarnivorousBunny's search above, and a lack of notability on the page it looks non-notable to me. Neonchameleon (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: An article sourced to primary sources, PR and passing mentions. No
  evidence provided or found that this service , or the company that offers it, is notable. AllyD (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• WP:CORP. Mkdw^talk 00:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]