Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goonies Never Say Die

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.

No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America1000 08:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Goonies Never Say Die

Goonies Never Say Die (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was contested but I'm still not convinced given the lack of coverage I saw in searching before I placed the PROD. Also not particularly convinced of

WP:BAND#5 claim. QuietHere (talk) 05:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

And for what it's worth, my original reasoning from the PROD:

Apparent non-notability. Even with an archive of the Rock Sound review and this one from PopMatters, I don't see enough to save this. Also worth noting the apparent CoI behind the page's creation.

QuietHere (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as prod contester; I added sources found by QuietHere and some of my own, which include coverage in major (international) music news outlets such as Pop Matters and Exclaim!. The article notes coverage in Alternative Press, which I can corroborate as I was subscribing to the paper magazine at the time (though I no longer have the paper copy, which is why I haven't added the footnote). I believe we can take the Metal Hammer review on good faith, as the others in the article have checked out, and offline sources are as good as online. That's enough to cross the threshold for bullet 1 of
    WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 00:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.