Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Salkilld

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Salkilld

Gordon Salkilld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of the three films we have articles on that he appeared in, 2 of them he does not even metrit being in the cast list, and the other one he had a very minor part as well. I see no evidence that even one of his roles was a significant role, let alone the multiple significant roles our guidelines require. The fact that article is only sourced to IMDb also does not help John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Improvements in line with "keep" comments need to be made if this is to be closed as keep. Extending for 7 days.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep - Was a semi-regular in quite a few British TV series as noted above among several other parts, though seems to have attracted limited coverage. I think the fact the article gives a lot of prominence to his small role in one Red Dwarf episode is possibly an issue that needs looking at, but not grounds for deletion. Dunarc (talk) 20:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.