Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gov2Taskforce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gov2Taskforce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no notability. The official website seems to just be a Wordpress blog. SL93 (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of notability to pass
talk - contribs) 01:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After several searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources for Government 2.0 Taskforce. No prejudice toward future re-creation if significant coverage in reliable sources occurs in the future. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails
reliable third-party sources. →B music ian 07:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — fails
WP:GNG. --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 10:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete—Per above. No independent notability found. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 14:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no trace of notability. Even barely manages to pass A7. →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 01:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.