Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grabhouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus -- a relist is unlikely to come to a different conclusion DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grabhouse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for six months now; no noticeable improvements. A single layoff event carries half of the article's sourcing [1]. The other half pretty much covers startup funding and their bare existence. So: what makes this a notable Internet startup in any way and why should it be part of the encyclopedia? Note the structural and sourcing issues described at COIN (permlink) that are typical of thrown-together startup

talk) 16:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails
WP:GNG Spiderone 20:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.