Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grabscrab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected. Essjay (Talk) 09:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grabscrab

)

non notable Scrabble variant; very few Google hits. Brianyoumans 07:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Willing to reconsider if notability and/or existence can be sourced from a neutral reliable source (i.e., not grabscrab.com). --Kinu ^t/_c 07:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MER-C 07:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect to Scrabble variants, which already has an entry on "GrabScrab". Frankly, I doubt it deserves even that much, nearly all the (few) ghits are on blogs. Tubezone 10:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the
list of CVG deletions. Koweja 16:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to scrabble variants as mentioned above. Koweja 16:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A redirect would be fine with me. --Brianyoumans 19:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per tubezone. --Wizardman 18:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.