Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great British Nuclear
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Great British Nuclear
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Great British Nuclear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Great British Nuclear is the trading name of
talk) 11:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
]
- Withdrawn by nominator - page made into redirect whilst parallel move discussion. talk) 08:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC) continues on BNFL page]
- Redirect As creator, I wasn't aware of the tangled histories of Britain's nuclear projects when I created the page. No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @WP:WDAFD) this deletion request and just changing Great British Nuclear to a redirect for now. {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 23:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)]
- I'm inclined to agree, will do that for now. talk) 08:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)]
- I'm inclined to agree, will do that for now.
- @
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 11:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.