Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Lane, Coventry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Green Lane, Coventry

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets

WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 07:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree that it does not meet notability for a standalone article. But in
WP:GNG. Streepjescode (talk) 11:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment I PRODed this a while ago as I didn't think it was notable, but if anyone wants to attempt the megamerge suggested by Streepjescode, that would be a good alternative to deletion. (I'm not volunteering). Mccapra (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mccapra (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.