Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Oasis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green Oasis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's not clear that this is a notable company. The dispensary seems to have been closed[1] The point of the article seems to be more about the litigation than the organization and while important, I don't think a single municipal regulation dispute is notable. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Due to the commonality of the name, research is a bit difficult, but searches did not appear to turn up enough in-depth coverage about this company to show they pass notability standards. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mentioned as this is certainly questionably better notable and improvable as although there are listed sources, this could certainly be better with enhanced coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeletePer Ricky81682 and fails
WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.