Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grinnin' Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grinnin' Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly fails

WP:NMUSIC either. The article creator edited Shaheen Jafargholi

to show that he released an acoustic album through this label; I can't find a source to verify this in any case but, even if it is true, it still doesn't make this an important or notable record label. Certainly not one that should have an article in a general encyclopaedia.

Wikipedia is not a company directory. We should only cover topics that are clearly demonstrated to be notable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, please. Not a single reliable, independent source as far as the eye can see. As an aside, I'm surprised
(shoot) 23:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - It's as simple as I can't find any independent sources. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the fact that an article sourced only to the subject's own website has survived 6 years would be a sad comment on Wikipedia except that articles without any sources at all have survived 16 years, so this is nothing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Coverage and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devoke water 10:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.