Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GroundWorks Theatre
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Move to Darkhorse Theater. MBisanz talk 00:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
GroundWorks Theatre
Seems to be an advert. Tagged for notability for 5 years. Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable, web sources all local (& not recent) or routine listings.TheLongTone (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Move/merge/repurpose/redirect. I don't believe this particular organization is notable, but my online research leaves me thinking that the Darkhorse Theater, where Groundworks' productions are staged, is notable. An article about the Darkhorse Theater, incorporating information about the various performing arts groups that perform there, would be a reasonable place for some of the content on this page. Unfortunately, there isn't an article about Darkhorse, but there actually is an article about the owner, Peter Kurland. I'm proposing to move this page to Darkhorse Theater and build it out as an article about Darkhorse. --Orlady (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Move and repurpose as Orlady proposes, for the reasons she states. And if more evidence of separate notability for GroundWorks turns up later, a separate article could always be spun out again. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.