Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Høstmørke
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Three whole weeks (including two relistings) without any comments other than the nom and a keep. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Høstmørke
- Høstmørke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
searched and cannot establish this as Wikipedia-notable - e.g. hasn't been covered in several publications from reliable/notable sources Lachlan Foley (talk) 04:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - or at least merge CD info to Isengard (Norwegian band). It may be hard to locate reviews for Norwegian music of the 1990s, given that these may be in print only. However, I had no trouble finding reviews at Sonic Abuse (2010), Peaceville: Darkthrone, and Encyclopaedia Metallum, which may alone be enough to establish notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:28, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 11:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.