Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. F. and A. P. Squire

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

H. F. and A. P. Squire

H. F. and A. P. Squire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A writing duo that appear to fail

WP:GNG. Harrias talk 09:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Harrias talk 09:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Harrias talk 09:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment- it's possible that the book they wrote has more claim of notability than the authors. Reyk YO! 10:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails
    WP:AUTHOR - not widely cited (I can find a few citations and it appears in more lists) or work which is more widely significant. I can't find anything to suggest GNG is met in any way for these chaps either. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete. Per nom and Blue Square Thing. StickyWicket (talk) 19:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.