Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haight Ashbury Beat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 13:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haight Ashbury Beat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

site is dead, no other refs given. no indication of notability. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero sources, zero indication of wp:notability. Even the one external link is nothing as they appear to be out of existence. Might make a good two sentences in another article if it had sourcing. North8000 (talk) 12:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Web page for sale, presumably defunct; no visibility on news archives.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero relevant web hits; fails
WP:NMEDIA for newspapers. §FreeRangeFrog 20:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete There's nothing here... --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of News-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.