Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammerax (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Andrew Base (talk) 04:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Hammerax

Hammerax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I know this article recently survived AfD (nominated for being too promotional) but there were only 3 !voters who responded and said that being overly promotional was a job for cleanup. I'm nominating it again for a lack of references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. There are 6 refs in the article, 2 of which are from the website, 2 are sales pitches for their cymbals, one is a blog and one is a mention-in-passing. My

HighKing++ 12:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging the previous participants and XfD closer. @Fma12: @Rocktober2018: @Dom Kaos: @Tone:
It is a business that makes products.
The rest of your post is mere Argumentum ad hominen. I will not dignify it further. 7&6=thirteen () 00:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Links to references to establish notability please.
HighKing++ 12:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep Notability marginally established by [1] and [2] and taken over the top by recent keep result. Because of the uncivil environment, I will not be watchlisting this page and will not be responding to any comments about my !vote here. ~Kvng (talk) 14:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Thanks for providing links. The topic is the company not any of their products so what we require is
      HighKing++ 16:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
      ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.