Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Han Chunyu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to NgAgo. Kurykh (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Han Chunyu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In light of the fact that his techniques and alleged results are questioned, I think the notability is also questionable. The university that he teaches at is itself not a major academic institution, it appears, based on the tenor of the Chinese Wikipedia article. (It lacks an English Wikipedia article.) Delete. --Nlu (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or Merge to
  WP:GNG. 646 Google News hits in English, over 115,000 hits in Chinese. The English article for his university is Hebei University of Science and Technology. Timmyshin (talk) 06:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to
  WP:BIO1E. The controversy appears to be well reported, see for example Nature, but this is the only thing the subject appears to be notable for. Anything useful can be picked up from the article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Han's technology is focused and praised by many scholars (at least in first months), and he was respected by many Nationalists and officers in mainland China. Even if his NgAgo technology is faked, the article may still be keeped. For example, the biography of
  talk) 10:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete or redirect until technology is proven. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Redirect as the clear solution given what the simple article information conveys. SwisterTwister talk 06:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect or merge to
  WP:PROF individually. – Joe (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Not notable by
  WP:PROF (the one paper discussed above is cited only 60 times in Google scholar) and nothing to merge. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.