Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hand Over Fist
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Non-notable as per
]Hand Over Fist
- Hand Over Fist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non notable without significant coverage of which I can find none. Rehevkor ✉ 17:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NN. I am not sure of the significance between "demo" and "for sale" - a demo or to give it its full spelling "demonstration" is a recording for showing what the song/artist is capable of. Once it is for sale then it can't really be a demo, but an official recording. All by the way, as notability is not established. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Please define the word "demo" and place this album in that context. Just because an article brands something a demo does not make it so. The claim needs to be cited and there are no references in this article. Futhermore, a demo once released is no longer a demo but a release, QED, as pointed above by clipman 01:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Response There is no Wikipedia: namespace definition of a demo, but there is Demo (music) and the simple fact that this article explicitly states that this is a demo several times. A demo does not cease to be a demo once money is exchanged. Cf. Nebraska (album) or Magnapop (album), which are demo albums that someone can buy with cash money. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nebraska proves the point well, whether or not my rationale is correct: your blunt statement that "Demos are assumed non-notable" is the issue here, as I pointed out in another debate. Now that you have contextualised that statement by stating that we need to prove clipman 05:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nebraska proves the point well, whether or not my rationale is correct: your blunt statement that "Demos are assumed non-notable" is the issue here, as I pointed out in another debate. Now that you have contextualised that statement by stating that we need to prove
- Response There is no Wikipedia: namespace definition of a demo, but there is Demo (music) and the simple fact that this article explicitly states that this is a demo several times. A demo does not cease to be a demo once money is exchanged. Cf. Nebraska (album) or Magnapop (album), which are demo albums that someone can buy with cash money. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails clipman 05:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - to correct a misinterpretation/assumption in the nomination. The guideline talk) 00:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. That's a point the nom is fully aware of now after recent discussion elsewhere --clipman 01:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. That's a point the nom is fully aware of now after recent discussion elsewhere --
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.