Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Riordan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on
"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 03:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
]
Hannah Riordan
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hannah Riordan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject doesn't meet the criteria for
WP:ROUTINE SwimproUSA (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly Talk to my owner:Online 08:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete there is a lack of the significant coverage needed to create an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.