Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanne Baekelandt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to

Topmodel (cycle 1). Sandstein 10:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hanne Baekelandt

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a person who may not meet notability guidelines

Linguist111 (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 15:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 15:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 15:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly any news coverage.

Linguist111 (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as questionably better for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 03:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to
Topmodel (cycle 1): No particularly significant coverage apparent after her Topmodel win. ^~~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~~ 09:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.