Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriet Hageman

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2022 United States House of Representatives election in Wyoming. Liz Read! Talk! 23:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Hageman

Harriet Hageman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ten year test for enduring significance anyway (the Christine O'Donnell test). But this demonstrates neither of those things.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in November if she wins the general election, but just running in a party primary is not sufficient grounds for a Wikipedia article at all. Bearcat (talk) 12:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Deleting this article will definitely tell everyone which side you stand on. In politics it should be important to hear all voices, not just the ones you want people to hear. I think it’s time that the media did not take a political side and allowed the people to use their voice — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.21.209.85 (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not "the media", and is not a platform for "people to use their voice" — Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, with rules about who qualifies to have an article on here and who doesn't. Bearcat (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.