Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heads of the House of York
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heads of the House of York
- Heads of the House of York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No such formal title ever existed, and hence any attempt to define the rightful inheritance to such a title must represent POV, and the resulting account represent OR. The page appears to have been created solely as a POV fork to rebut the descent hypothesized in the Britain's Real Monarch documentary (itself FRINGE). The only authentic portions of this page were copied from the House of York page, and no benefit would come from merging the added nonsense back there. Agricolae (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Agricolae (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Agricolae (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per rationale in nom. --Jza84 | Talk 23:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per well reasoned nominating statement. ]
- Delete, definitely seems like ]
- Delete per nominating statement.--Harkey (talk) 08:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.