Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HealthDay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HealthDay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company division - fails

WP:ADMASQ. ukexpat (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Promotional article about non-notable company. Maproom (talk) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promo bollox. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as purely promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' promotional fluff, with no evidence of meeting notability criteria. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.